|
|
|
| On December 16 2000 PHJ and FIQ started the second trial game of TOAW. The scenario they chose to play are called "Fulda 76" (it's the same scenario as used in the first trial game) and are a fictitious scenario about the Warzaw Pact attacking Western Europe through Germany near the town of Fulda. An area, which NATO military experts called the Fulda Gap. They called it this, because they had established that this would be the gap which would be the most likely place the Warzaw Pact would attack if they attacked West Germany. PHJ plays the Warzaw Pact, and has to take Frankfurt in Western Germany as they primary objective in the game. They start way behind in Victory Points and have a lot of catching up to do. The map covers the area from Siegen in West Germany in the north-west corner
of the map to Eisenach in East Germany in the north-east corner. The bottom of
the map covers the area from Wiesbaden and Mainz in West Germany in the
south-west corner to Schweinfurt in West Germany in the south-east corner.
FIQ obviously plays NATO. His dilemma is that from the beginning of the game he doesn't have all the military forces that he probably would like to have in that area. But reinforcements are on its way - and refugees are filling out on the roads, which hampers there movement somewhat. December 16th: The game has just started and WAPA has already taken Bad Hersfeld (worth 25 points). NATO faces a serious challenge as the Reds are streaming into Germany. Starting with 350 points against WAPA's 50 points,
there is a lot to give from, but the situation cannot get out of hand. January 6th: WAPA are
continuing to drive Westward, and NATO are trying to put up defenses at the best
possible locations. As part of this strategy, NATO has abandoned Schweinfurt for
now (worth 25 points). NATO re-took Bad Hersfeld at the end of the second round (worth 25 points). January 8th:
WAPA are still driving West, and obviously took Schweinfurt in round 3 without
problems as NATO had abandoned this in the previous round. NATO are receiving reinforcements which immediately are sent towards the front, hoping to stop the Reds. January 14th: WAPA troops moved towards Bad Hersfeld, Fulda and Bad Kissingen. After initiating several attacks, they took both Bad Hersfeld and Bad Kissingen (both worth 25 points) in the 4 turn of the game. Thereby cutting the NATO lead with 100 points. NATO is now in the lead with 167 points. NATO moved troops forward towards Bad Hersfeld, in an attempt to re-take this city, and towards Fulda in an effort to defend this important city (worth 50 points). NATO counter-attacked at both Bad Hersfeld and Bad Kissingen, but were unable to snatch these cities away from the enemy. January 15th: WAPA troops moved towards Fulda and Bad Hersfeld. After several attacks, they took Fulda (worth 50 points) at the end of the turn. NATO is now down to leading with 77 points, which constitutes a draw. NATO again moved troops forwards towards Bad Hersfeld and Fulda in an effort to re-take the cities. So far without any luck. January 19th: The front
lines are relatively static at this point. NATO is trying to get back Bad
Kissingen and Fulda, but so far they have no luck in doing that January 21st: Most of the front
lines are still relatively static, but the Warsaw Pact makes a surprise airborne
attack on Giessen (worth 25 points) and takes it without any trouble. In a similar airborne attack, NATO inserts troops behind WAPA lines near the city of Eisenach (also worth 25 points). After the insertion, they started to attack and push back defenders near the city. During the frontline NATO for the first time managed to push some of the WAPA troops back, but no definitive battle have taken place. WAPA once again closed the gap to the NATO lead, which is now down to 42 points as both sides have objective points worth 200 points. WAPA has battle damages worth 85 points, while NATO's battle damages so far have reached 43 points. February 12th: Midway through this round NATO are in the
lead with 51 points; both sides have 200 points from controlling objectives, and
WAPA has 105 negative points in troop losses, while NATO has 54 negative points. February 13th: Midway through this round NATO are in the lead
with 104 points: NATO controls objectives worth 225 points against WAPA's 175,
and WAPA have 115 negative points in troop losses against NATO's 61 negative
points. February
14th: The 10th round of this trial game starts with WAPA forces attacking at
all locations. They have moderate success in pushing NATO forces back. February 18th: The 11th
round of the trial game starts with WAPA forces once again re-take Eisenach (25
points). They attack several places, but have only limited success. WAPA tries to attack at Eisenacn and Fulda again in the 12th round, and
although they are successful in their attack (the NATO troops retreats), the
WAPA troops does not have enough stamina to take advantage and move forward. February 20th: WAPA
presses forward again, desperately trying to re-gain the foothold they held
earlier in this scenario. They have no real success in doing this. February 21st: WAPA
continues to attempt to pressure NATO troops out of Eisenach and Bad Hersfeld.
Without great success, though. The advance against Frankfurt have slowed down,
but still continues. February 2001 |